TRI National Analysis

Source Reduction Activities by Chemical in the 2015 TRI National Analysis

See Other Graphics in this Section

For the chemicals with the highest source reduction reporting rates over the last 5 years, this figure shows the types of activities implemented, and the percent change in the quantity of waste managed.
 
 
 

From 2011 to 2015:

  • Chemicals with the highest source reduction reporting rate were: N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, dichloromethane, trichloroethylene, di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, and decabromodiphenyl oxide.
  • The type of source reduction activity implemented for these chemicals varies depending on their use in industrial operations and the chemical’s characteristics. For example:
    • Raw material modification is commonly reported as a source reduction activity to reduce waste of di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a plasticizer, and decabromodiphenyl oxide (decaBDE), a flame retardant. Many facilities report that they are in the process of replacing both chemicals with environmentally preferable alternatives.
    • Cleaning and degreasing, including changing to aqueous cleaners, is implemented for common industrial solvents such as trichloroethylene (TCE), dichloromethane (DCM, also known as methylene chloride), and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP).
  • The quantity of waste managed over the last 5 years decreased considerably for DCM, DEHP, and decaBDE. For the other chemicals shown in the figure, waste quantities have increased. While quantities of waste managed overall increased by 15% over this post-recession time period, the increases in quantities of NMP managed exceeded the average increase in quantity of chemical waste managed. Use of NMP expanded in recent years as a substitute for chlorinated solvents such as DCM.

Facilities may also report additional details to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program about their source reduction, recycling, or pollution control activities.

Examples of additional pollution prevention-related information for 2015:

You can view all reported pollution prevention activities and compare facilities’ waste management methods and trends for any TRI chemical by using the TRI P2 Search Tool.

This page was published in January 2017 and uses the 2015 TRI National Analysis dataset made public in TRI Explorer in October 2016.

Top of Page